Signed by the Governor: Arkansas Decriminalizes Firearm “Silencers”

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (March 26, 2019) – Last week, Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson signed a bill into law decriminalizing the manufacture and possession of firearm suppressors in the state. The new law not only removes a layer of state regulation; it will help foster an environment hostile to federal gun control in Arkansas.

Sen. Bob Ballinger (R-Berryville) introduced Senate Bill 400 (SB400) earlier this year. The new law repeals current Arkansas statutes prohibiting the possession, manufacture, transport, repair, or sale of firearm “silencers,” more appropriately referred to as “suppressors.” It also removes a prohibition on a “firearm that has been specially made or specially adapted for silent discharge,” while modifying the prohibition on certain weapons so that a person must “knowingly” possesses or sells them.

Suppressors simply muffle the sound of a gun. They do not literally silence firearms. Nevertheless, the federal government heavily regulates silencers under the National Firearms Act. The feds charge a $200 tax on the purchase of the devices. Buying one also requires months-long waits after filing extensive paperwork with the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

The repeal of state suppressor restrictions will not alter federal law, but it does remove a layer of law hindering access to these harmless devices. The widespread easing of suppressor regulation in states subtly undermines federal efforts to unconstitutionally regulate firearms.

With the Governor’s signature, the new law will go into effect 90 days after the legislature adjourns for 2019. Tennessee enacted a similar law in 2017,

As we’ve seen with marijuana and industrial hemp, a federal regulation becomes ineffective when states ignore it and pass laws encouraging the prohibited activity. Or when the state decriminalizes and people start ignoring the federal prohibition without any further state “permission” to do so.

Either way, the federal government lacks the enforcement power necessary to maintain its ban in such a climate, and people will increasingly take on the risk of federal sanctions if they know the state will not interfere. This increases when the state actively encourages “the market.”

Less restrictive state gun laws such as SB400 can have a similar impact on federal gun laws. It will make it that much more difficult for the feds to enforce federal gun control, should the people defy it, and increase the likelihood that states with few limits will simply refuse to cooperate with future federal enforcement efforts.

State actions like SB400 lower barriers for those wanting to the option of defending themselves with firearms and encourage a “gun-friendly” environment that would make federal efforts to limit firearms that much more difficult.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mike Crapo Warns Big Banks Against Caving To Progressives On Guns

Cory Booker Peddles False Gun Law ‘Loopholes’ During CNN Town Hall